raghu112
12-27 06:04 PM
No.
wallpaper Long Brunette Hairstyle
karl65
10-27 08:54 AM
Does Lawyer receives AP and sends it to us OR does applicants receive it?
I haven't received AP yet. got EAD/FP/notices.
cheers
Iad
You do not need to open a new tread to ask this. There is a tread about AP trend
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=14005
Some lawyers receive the AP and sometimes the applicants. I do not know WHY?????
I haven't received AP yet. got EAD/FP/notices.
cheers
Iad
You do not need to open a new tread to ask this. There is a tread about AP trend
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=14005
Some lawyers receive the AP and sometimes the applicants. I do not know WHY?????
aspiration
06-18 10:48 AM
Hello Senior Members,
I have just started a thread to ask if there is any need to call our local senators for co-sponsoring S.3084 ( Barbara Boxer), which is identical bill in Senate for HR 6039.
Is core working to get similar bills for HR.5882 and HR 5921 to get introduced in Senate?
If the question is inappropriate at this time then kindly close the thread.
Thanks.
I have just started a thread to ask if there is any need to call our local senators for co-sponsoring S.3084 ( Barbara Boxer), which is identical bill in Senate for HR 6039.
Is core working to get similar bills for HR.5882 and HR 5921 to get introduced in Senate?
If the question is inappropriate at this time then kindly close the thread.
Thanks.
2011 Christa Miller wore medium
gc_perm2k6
09-26 11:04 PM
Hi,
My friend had done 7th Yr Extension last month. By Mistake she gave dates such that it showed that she was out of USA for 1 year. So the lawyer filed for 3 yr extension and USCIS permitted. Is this rectifiable?
Thanks
PD 1st May 2006
Perm Labor Approved
My friend had done 7th Yr Extension last month. By Mistake she gave dates such that it showed that she was out of USA for 1 year. So the lawyer filed for 3 yr extension and USCIS permitted. Is this rectifiable?
Thanks
PD 1st May 2006
Perm Labor Approved
more...
akshayae
09-07 12:56 PM
Folks,
Members from the DC area will be meeting in the Great Falls (Virginina)public library meeting room from 1 pm to 3 pm on Saturday September 8th 2007. Members in DC/VA/MD areas are requested to meet other members to find out more info about the rally and importance of making this rally a success. The address for Great Falls Public Library is
Date and Time
Sep 8th 2007 Time from 1 pm to 3 pm
Meeting Room
9830 Georgetown Pike, Great Falls, VA 22066-2634
Ph 703-757-8560
We look forward to meeting you at Great Falls Public Library
Members from the DC area will be meeting in the Great Falls (Virginina)public library meeting room from 1 pm to 3 pm on Saturday September 8th 2007. Members in DC/VA/MD areas are requested to meet other members to find out more info about the rally and importance of making this rally a success. The address for Great Falls Public Library is
Date and Time
Sep 8th 2007 Time from 1 pm to 3 pm
Meeting Room
9830 Georgetown Pike, Great Falls, VA 22066-2634
Ph 703-757-8560
We look forward to meeting you at Great Falls Public Library
gcformeornot
03-05 05:01 PM
it is not counted. What you see in W2 that is your wage...
more...
chaks7
07-17 09:50 PM
Congrats to IV core team on pulling something very improbable; filing I-485 till Aug 17th honoring the July visa bulletin.
Any idea what are the options for Employment-based CP? I already applied for CP and am waiting for Packet 3. Packet 3 itself takes 6-8 weeks for processing. I tried to find info when visa number is alloted when u choose CP for greencard. I am getting conflicting information.
Can I file I-485; can I switch to 485 from CP. How long does the switch take. Thanks for ur inputs.
PS: I am re-posting this message as I have n't heard from anyone. My apologies.
-Thanks
Chak.
Any idea what are the options for Employment-based CP? I already applied for CP and am waiting for Packet 3. Packet 3 itself takes 6-8 weeks for processing. I tried to find info when visa number is alloted when u choose CP for greencard. I am getting conflicting information.
Can I file I-485; can I switch to 485 from CP. How long does the switch take. Thanks for ur inputs.
PS: I am re-posting this message as I have n't heard from anyone. My apologies.
-Thanks
Chak.
2010 2010 Modern Bob Hairstyle
TheCanadian
09-21 03:20 PM
I can has grammar now?
more...
shri_n
01-12 06:42 PM
Hi,
I lost my original passport and was issued a new passort which is valid till 12 feb 2007. I mailed my application to the indian consulate but they stamped the extension of passport for 1 more year. The first page of the passport say it expires the on 12th feb but on the next page th consular general stamped the extension of the passport till 12th jan 2008. I am goin to india on 26th jan for H1b stamping. I wanted to know what are the chances of the visa getting rejected at the US embassy. Alsp is the passport valid for travel
Thanks
Shri
I lost my original passport and was issued a new passort which is valid till 12 feb 2007. I mailed my application to the indian consulate but they stamped the extension of passport for 1 more year. The first page of the passport say it expires the on 12th feb but on the next page th consular general stamped the extension of the passport till 12th jan 2008. I am goin to india on 26th jan for H1b stamping. I wanted to know what are the chances of the visa getting rejected at the US embassy. Alsp is the passport valid for travel
Thanks
Shri
hair Brunette long hairstyles
Blog Feeds
12-11 10:00 PM
The media really should have picked up the truly obnoxious (and completely false) appeal to racism to convince his colleagues to vote against the DREAM Act last night: Mr. Speaker, if this act passes, if an illegal immigrant happens to be of a racial or ethnic minority, which the vast majority of illegal immigrants are, that individual, as soon as legal status is granted, will be entitled to all the education, employment, job training, government contracts, and other minority preferences that are written into our Federal and State laws. As a result, the DREAM Act would not only put illegal...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/12/rohrabacher-plays-race-card-in-arguing-against-dream-act.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/12/rohrabacher-plays-race-card-in-arguing-against-dream-act.html)
more...
Ann Ruben
05-24 08:27 AM
You should be protected by the 180 day grace period provided by �245(k).
hot 3b, Medium hair styles,
i4u
04-28 11:39 AM
with I -140 you don't need your family here......
more...
house dark runette long perm hair
Nakano
03-17 12:21 PM
Hi Everyone,
My H1B visa is valid till Sep 2009. I am planing to go for H1B extension. I heard, some people who applied for extension got rejected in recent past. I am planing to go to Canada for extension.
Please share your advices and experiences... that would be helpful...
Please suggest me following...
- Better place to go for extension( Canada/ India/ some other?)
- What are the things we need to be prepared before that
- What are questions they are asking
- What are the documnets we MUST carry
Please reply for my post. I thank you for you time.
NK
My H1B visa is valid till Sep 2009. I am planing to go for H1B extension. I heard, some people who applied for extension got rejected in recent past. I am planing to go to Canada for extension.
Please share your advices and experiences... that would be helpful...
Please suggest me following...
- Better place to go for extension( Canada/ India/ some other?)
- What are the things we need to be prepared before that
- What are questions they are asking
- What are the documnets we MUST carry
Please reply for my post. I thank you for you time.
NK
tattoo long brown hairstyles. how to
sameplace
02-27 01:12 PM
Hi, I have exactly the same question. Anybody has any idea on it? Thanks!!
more...
pictures runette medium length
gcisadawg
01-20 08:07 PM
Our attorney's sent an email following this procedure. Hoping for the best!
dresses If you have long brunette
rodnyb
11-27 04:04 PM
I was searching on all programmer salary's on SalaryList.com (http://salarylist.com), it looks like we are much higher than the other majors, business analyst, finance analyst. So if I want to do AC21, in current condition, should I keep same salary? Several companies I talk to can only match now
more...
makeup Straw Set - Brunette, Medium
rkdnc9
12-10 09:53 AM
Friends,
I am on H1 right now. I got my H1 last year, Before that I was on OPT (F1). I didnt go to India after I got my H1 and I am employed since the H1 started (Oct 1,2007). I am planning to go to India now in dec. I heard that if you stay more than an year after getting H1 and without getting the passport stamped, I need to fill out an additional form before I got to the visa interview. Is this true??
Secondly, When I applied for H1, I applied thru company A. But even before the H1 started (which is Oct 1,2007) and as soon as my H1 (for company A) got approved (Sept 10, 2007) I applied for H1 transfer to company B. So I was on Company B's H1 from Oct 1,2007 (which is the actual start date of my H1). Now, would this pose a potential problem at the visa interview?
Please clear my doubts guys.
Thanks.
I am on H1 right now. I got my H1 last year, Before that I was on OPT (F1). I didnt go to India after I got my H1 and I am employed since the H1 started (Oct 1,2007). I am planning to go to India now in dec. I heard that if you stay more than an year after getting H1 and without getting the passport stamped, I need to fill out an additional form before I got to the visa interview. Is this true??
Secondly, When I applied for H1, I applied thru company A. But even before the H1 started (which is Oct 1,2007) and as soon as my H1 (for company A) got approved (Sept 10, 2007) I applied for H1 transfer to company B. So I was on Company B's H1 from Oct 1,2007 (which is the actual start date of my H1). Now, would this pose a potential problem at the visa interview?
Please clear my doubts guys.
Thanks.
girlfriend Brunette Long Hairstyles
Macaca
05-26 12:01 PM
A Tough 5 Months, but Democrats Cite Successes (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/26/washington/26cong.html?_r=1&oref=slogin) By ROBIN TONER and CARL HULSE, New Yor Times, May 26, 2007
WASHINGTON, May 25 � After five months in power, Congressional Democrats headed home for their Memorial Day recess with only a few signature accomplishments on the domestic front, notably an increase in the minimum wage, and the prospect of returning to a renewed struggle with the Bush administration over the war in Iraq.
But Democratic leaders say their principal accomplishment, so far, is not reflected in the legislative scorecard: The transformation of the policy debate and the reassertion of Congressional power, especially on the Iraq war.
�We�ve moved the national debate on the war,� said Senator Richard J. Durbin of Illinois, the No. 2 Democrat in the Senate. �We were sleepwalking through this war until the Congress changed hands. And now, every month, this president faces another challenge to his policy.�
The spending legislation for Iraq that passed Thursday night, which lacked a timeline for troop withdrawal, left much of the party�s antiwar base unhappy, and carried only a third of the Democratic votes in the House. But Democratic leaders promised to ratchet up the pressure on President Bush for an exit strategy in Iraq, and they have the legislative vehicles to do so in June and July, building to what all sides expect to be a clash this fall. Top military leaders have committed to delivering a progress report on their troop buildup strategy in September.
Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California tried to send a clear message on Friday that any legislative victory Mr. Bush won this week, when Democrats acceded to his demands and removed the withdrawal timeline, would be short-lived. �We are going to bring an end to this war,� Ms. Pelosi said. �All of us have that goal.�
On the domestic front, Democrats passed the first minimum wage increase in 10 years this week; it was the first item in their campaign agenda from last year, called �Six-for-06,� to win final passage. Other items are prepared for final votes this summer, including an expansion of embryonic stem cell research and the recommendations of the Sept 11 commission on domestic security.
The Democrats made their mark in other ways � notably, using their committee and oversight powers for a broad challenge to administration policies, on issues including the treatment of wounded Iraq veterans and the dismissals of United States attorneys by the Justice Department. Senate Democrats said they had held 75 hearings related to Iraq in the last five months.
Even so, in the inevitable message wars, Republican leaders portrayed the Democrats as disorganized and ineffective, sending Republican members home this weekend with talking points that declare, �Democrats accomplish none in �07.� Representative John A. Boehner of Ohio, the Republican leader, said Friday that the Democrats� first five months were �marked by broken promises, missed opportunities and gridlock caused by strife within the majority party�s ranks.�
But senior Republican officials and some lawmakers privately admitted that Democrats won some victories in recent days, including progress on an immigration overhaul in the Senate and the strong House vote on new lobbying rules.
One of the biggest complaints of Republicans is that House Democrats, who promised to be fairer and more bipartisan in the conduct of floor debate after a decade of heavy-handed Republican rule, have not delivered. Top Democrats admit privately that there is merit to those complaints, and have begun negotiations to try to cool the partisan tensions.
Democrats themselves reflected that little came easily over the last five months, which offered a lesson in the difficulties of governing with very slim majorities, especially in the Senate. Moreover, there are real fault lines and divisions within the party, most apparent, perhaps, on how fast and how far to go in demanding an end to the war in Iraq.
�It�s been a tough slog,� said a senior House Democratic strategist close to the leadership, alluding to the difficulties in managing the spending bill for Iraq. �You�re asking people to vote for a moderate plan instead of the plan that�s closest to their hearts.�
Representative Jim McGovern, Democrat of Massachusetts and a leader in the antiwar caucus, said Thursday night: �A lot of us are frustrated that the war�s still going on. But the fact of the matter is, there�s movement, there�s significant movement, from where we were last November to where we are now.�
Many of the party�s liberal activists, though, remained angry at what they saw as a capitulation to Mr. Bush.
Other fault lines were re-emerging in the party. House Democrats are only beginning to deal with their deep divisions on trade, as a closed caucus this week underscored. Some freshmen, like Representative Betty Sutton, Democrat of Ohio, are intent on making major changes to American trade policy, much greater than the recent deal with the Bush administration on environmental and labor standards announced by the Democratic leadership.
�Our problems with the trading system and the fact that it is broken are much bigger than just having these standards on paper,� Ms. Sutton said.
Down the road, more internal clashes are likely over taxes and spending priorities. Julian Zelizer, a historian and expert on Congress at Boston University, said Ms. Pelosi�s job would, in many ways, get harder once she moved beyond the war. �In some ways, the divisions over domestic issues are just as great, on things like trade,� Mr. Zelizer said.
Both Ms. Pelosi and her Senate counterpart, Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, have had their struggles this year. Mr. Reid drew fire for, among other things, suggesting that the Iraq war was lost. But Democratic senators have expressed strong confidence in his leadership. Ms. Pelosi, the first female speaker, has been a target of repeated Republican efforts to embarrass her. But she has weathered them and has generally held fractious Democrats together.
Representative Barney Frank, Democrat of Massachusetts, said Thursday night: �To some extent, the Democratic leadership fought above its weight. They don�t really have the votes in the Senate.�
Mr. Frank argued that sending Mr. Bush the initial Iraq spending bill, with a withdrawal timeline, and forcing him to veto it would one day be viewed as a turning point after a long pattern of �Congressional ducking.�
�I think Congress has come closer to standing up this time,� he said.
WASHINGTON, May 25 � After five months in power, Congressional Democrats headed home for their Memorial Day recess with only a few signature accomplishments on the domestic front, notably an increase in the minimum wage, and the prospect of returning to a renewed struggle with the Bush administration over the war in Iraq.
But Democratic leaders say their principal accomplishment, so far, is not reflected in the legislative scorecard: The transformation of the policy debate and the reassertion of Congressional power, especially on the Iraq war.
�We�ve moved the national debate on the war,� said Senator Richard J. Durbin of Illinois, the No. 2 Democrat in the Senate. �We were sleepwalking through this war until the Congress changed hands. And now, every month, this president faces another challenge to his policy.�
The spending legislation for Iraq that passed Thursday night, which lacked a timeline for troop withdrawal, left much of the party�s antiwar base unhappy, and carried only a third of the Democratic votes in the House. But Democratic leaders promised to ratchet up the pressure on President Bush for an exit strategy in Iraq, and they have the legislative vehicles to do so in June and July, building to what all sides expect to be a clash this fall. Top military leaders have committed to delivering a progress report on their troop buildup strategy in September.
Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California tried to send a clear message on Friday that any legislative victory Mr. Bush won this week, when Democrats acceded to his demands and removed the withdrawal timeline, would be short-lived. �We are going to bring an end to this war,� Ms. Pelosi said. �All of us have that goal.�
On the domestic front, Democrats passed the first minimum wage increase in 10 years this week; it was the first item in their campaign agenda from last year, called �Six-for-06,� to win final passage. Other items are prepared for final votes this summer, including an expansion of embryonic stem cell research and the recommendations of the Sept 11 commission on domestic security.
The Democrats made their mark in other ways � notably, using their committee and oversight powers for a broad challenge to administration policies, on issues including the treatment of wounded Iraq veterans and the dismissals of United States attorneys by the Justice Department. Senate Democrats said they had held 75 hearings related to Iraq in the last five months.
Even so, in the inevitable message wars, Republican leaders portrayed the Democrats as disorganized and ineffective, sending Republican members home this weekend with talking points that declare, �Democrats accomplish none in �07.� Representative John A. Boehner of Ohio, the Republican leader, said Friday that the Democrats� first five months were �marked by broken promises, missed opportunities and gridlock caused by strife within the majority party�s ranks.�
But senior Republican officials and some lawmakers privately admitted that Democrats won some victories in recent days, including progress on an immigration overhaul in the Senate and the strong House vote on new lobbying rules.
One of the biggest complaints of Republicans is that House Democrats, who promised to be fairer and more bipartisan in the conduct of floor debate after a decade of heavy-handed Republican rule, have not delivered. Top Democrats admit privately that there is merit to those complaints, and have begun negotiations to try to cool the partisan tensions.
Democrats themselves reflected that little came easily over the last five months, which offered a lesson in the difficulties of governing with very slim majorities, especially in the Senate. Moreover, there are real fault lines and divisions within the party, most apparent, perhaps, on how fast and how far to go in demanding an end to the war in Iraq.
�It�s been a tough slog,� said a senior House Democratic strategist close to the leadership, alluding to the difficulties in managing the spending bill for Iraq. �You�re asking people to vote for a moderate plan instead of the plan that�s closest to their hearts.�
Representative Jim McGovern, Democrat of Massachusetts and a leader in the antiwar caucus, said Thursday night: �A lot of us are frustrated that the war�s still going on. But the fact of the matter is, there�s movement, there�s significant movement, from where we were last November to where we are now.�
Many of the party�s liberal activists, though, remained angry at what they saw as a capitulation to Mr. Bush.
Other fault lines were re-emerging in the party. House Democrats are only beginning to deal with their deep divisions on trade, as a closed caucus this week underscored. Some freshmen, like Representative Betty Sutton, Democrat of Ohio, are intent on making major changes to American trade policy, much greater than the recent deal with the Bush administration on environmental and labor standards announced by the Democratic leadership.
�Our problems with the trading system and the fact that it is broken are much bigger than just having these standards on paper,� Ms. Sutton said.
Down the road, more internal clashes are likely over taxes and spending priorities. Julian Zelizer, a historian and expert on Congress at Boston University, said Ms. Pelosi�s job would, in many ways, get harder once she moved beyond the war. �In some ways, the divisions over domestic issues are just as great, on things like trade,� Mr. Zelizer said.
Both Ms. Pelosi and her Senate counterpart, Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, have had their struggles this year. Mr. Reid drew fire for, among other things, suggesting that the Iraq war was lost. But Democratic senators have expressed strong confidence in his leadership. Ms. Pelosi, the first female speaker, has been a target of repeated Republican efforts to embarrass her. But she has weathered them and has generally held fractious Democrats together.
Representative Barney Frank, Democrat of Massachusetts, said Thursday night: �To some extent, the Democratic leadership fought above its weight. They don�t really have the votes in the Senate.�
Mr. Frank argued that sending Mr. Bush the initial Iraq spending bill, with a withdrawal timeline, and forcing him to veto it would one day be viewed as a turning point after a long pattern of �Congressional ducking.�
�I think Congress has come closer to standing up this time,� he said.
hairstyles medium layered hairstyles.
gchoubey
05-22 01:40 PM
I am working on H1b visa and changed job mid of last year. I got my H1B visa and stamping and is valid till September 2010 . Now I changed my job and has another H1b visa and I 94 which is valid till 2012.
I am going to Canada to get Visa stamped and want to know if I will be allowed to come back to US even if my request gets denied.
And what will happen to my old visa ?
I am going to Canada to get Visa stamped and want to know if I will be allowed to come back to US even if my request gets denied.
And what will happen to my old visa ?
Bogdan
07-03 07:52 PM
Hi,
Based on what I know, the medical exam has to be less than 1 year old on the date of I-485 application submission. However, I have seen different opinions on this forum. Some state that the exam date cannot be more than 30 days before I-485 submission, because the HIV test and syphyllis test (sorry if not typed correctly) are valid for 30 days only. Could anyone clarify this, please?
Thanks in advance.
Bogdan
Based on what I know, the medical exam has to be less than 1 year old on the date of I-485 application submission. However, I have seen different opinions on this forum. Some state that the exam date cannot be more than 30 days before I-485 submission, because the HIV test and syphyllis test (sorry if not typed correctly) are valid for 30 days only. Could anyone clarify this, please?
Thanks in advance.
Bogdan
storm
08-11 11:46 AM
May 2007 filers, please post your processing status here:
NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER
PD: JUNE 2003
I-140 FILED: OCTOBER, 2005
I-140 APPROVED: APRIL, 2006
I-485/EAD FILED: MAY 1, 2007
FP: JUNE 13, 2007
EAD APPROVED: JULY 27, 2007
EAD CARD RECEIVED: AUGUST 2, 2007
I-485 LUD'S - June 13, 2007 - after FP
Sept. 4, 2007 - soft LUD - no status change
Sept. 27, 2007 - card production ordered
Oct. 2, 2007 - approval notice sent
Oct. 4, 2007 - cards received
NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER
PD: JUNE 2003
I-140 FILED: OCTOBER, 2005
I-140 APPROVED: APRIL, 2006
I-485/EAD FILED: MAY 1, 2007
FP: JUNE 13, 2007
EAD APPROVED: JULY 27, 2007
EAD CARD RECEIVED: AUGUST 2, 2007
I-485 LUD'S - June 13, 2007 - after FP
Sept. 4, 2007 - soft LUD - no status change
Sept. 27, 2007 - card production ordered
Oct. 2, 2007 - approval notice sent
Oct. 4, 2007 - cards received
No comments:
Post a Comment